In short
Consumer Commissions usually want proof that a fault is a manufacturing defect, not wear, misuse or accident damage. The strongest evidence is a chain of job cards showing the same complaint during the warranty period, supported by an independent automobile expert’s report. The Commission can also send the matter for testing, and some defects, such as airbags that fail in a frontal crash, can speak for themselves.
Many vehicle complaints fail not because the buyer is wrong, but because the defect was never proved. Manufacturers commonly answer that the problem was caused by the way the vehicle was driven or maintained, or that it was fixed under warranty. This post explains what evidence the Consumer Commissions look for, and how to collect it from the first day of trouble.
Why proof matters
An order to replace a vehicle or refund its price is a serious one, and Commissions make it only on firm evidence of a defect in manufacture. In a 2023 case involving a luxury car, Mercedes-Benz India v. Revathi Giri, the National Commission set aside an order to replace the car or refund its price, because there was no expert evidence of an inherent manufacturing defect and the reported problems had been attended to under warranty. That case was decided under the old 1986 Act, but the approach to proof is the same today.
1. The job cards
The single most useful document is the job card that the authorised service centre opens each time the vehicle comes in. A series of job cards recording the same complaint, within the warranty period and at low mileage, shows that the problem is persistent and that repairs did not cure it. Check each job card before signing:
- Your complaint should be written in your words, not shortened to “general check”.
- The date, the odometer reading and the work done should be recorded.
- Ask for a copy every time, and photograph it if a copy is refused.
2. An independent expert’s report
An inspection report from a qualified automobile engineer who is independent of the dealer is often what turns a strong suspicion into proof. The report should describe the inspection, the tests done, the cause of the fault and why it points to manufacture rather than use. Attach it to the complaint, with the expert’s qualifications and an affidavit, so that it can be read as evidence.
3. Testing ordered by the Commission
Where a defect cannot be decided without proper analysis or testing, Section 38(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 allows the District Commission to take a sample, have it sealed and send it to an appropriate laboratory, which is to report within 45 days. The complainant deposits the testing fee. Either side can object to the report and be heard on it. For a vehicle, this usually means inspection of the vehicle or the failed part by a testing agency or an expert the Commission appoints.
4. Your own records
- The invoice, delivery note, warranty booklet and owner’s manual.
- Photographs and videos of the fault as it happens, such as warning lights, smoke, leaks or noises.
- Diagnostic or scan reports, if any were taken.
- Emails, chat messages and complaint numbers from the dealer and the manufacturer, including any written reasons for refusing warranty.
- A simple diary of when the problem occurred and how it affected you.
Messages, photographs and emails are electronic records. When they are filed as evidence, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 requires a certificate about how they were produced and stored (Section 63), so keep the original phone or email account.
When the defect speaks for itself
Some failures need little expert explanation. In Hyundai Motor India Ltd. v. Shailendra Bhatnagar (20 April 2022), the front airbags of a car did not open in a frontal collision. The Supreme Court upheld the order to replace the car and pay compensation, observing that a buyer is entitled to expect airbags to open in such a crash and need not understand the physics of a collision. It also held that time to complain ran from when the defect surfaced, the date of the accident, and not from the date of purchase. The case was under the 1986 Act.
Keep the vehicle available
If the case may need an inspection, do not sell the vehicle, change the failed parts at an outside workshop, or modify it while the dispute is pending. If a part must be replaced, ask for the old part to be returned to you, sealed and labelled.
Common questions
Is an expert report compulsory to prove a vehicle defect?
Not in every case, but Consumer Commissions often expect expert evidence before ordering replacement or refund. Some defects, such as airbags failing to open in a frontal crash, have been accepted without detailed technical proof.
Can the consumer court send my vehicle for testing?
Yes. Under Section 38(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the District Commission can have the goods tested by an appropriate laboratory, which is to report within 45 days. The complainant deposits the testing fee.
Are WhatsApp messages and videos valid evidence?
Yes, as electronic records, with the certificate required by Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Keep the original device or account.
What if the service centre does not write my complaint on the job card?
Insist that it records your complaint in your words. If it refuses, send an email the same day describing the problem and the visit, so that there is a dated record.
Prepared by N. Ilakkiya, Advocate, CSIA Law Associates
Prepared on . The law is stated as on that date.
This post is general information on Indian law as on 20 October 2026 and is not legal advice. Laws and their interpretation change, so check the current position. For advice on your own facts, consult an advocate.